Відео

"‘We accidentally recorded over the original videos and photos, and we destroyed all the technology, so that’s why we haven’t been back to the moon’ " Said nobody ever. "The ‘moon rocks’ given to Netherlands by Neil Armstrong himself, were investigated and turned out to be petrified wood" A piece of petrified wood was mislabelled in one Dutch museum. The same museum also had actual lunar samples. "Not only that, they went 6 times, played golf and drove the buggy around" Yes. "and done flips." Really? During which Apollo mission did that happen? "But erm… we don’t know how to go back 80 years later with much improved tech etc." Have you never heard of Artemis? "If you believe that , then you have Stockholm syndrome." That's not what Stockholm syndrome is. So, really, REALLY bad show on your part.

@@paulbeardsley4095 they did say that. What happened to the recordings then oh wise one? And the tech, and the petrified wood ??

@@paulbeardsley4095 ✔

@@altingashi3927 Why is it that you hoaxtards find it so necessary to be so deceitful and tell lies like that. Is it because you're so insecure in your alternative reality that you have to do that ?

Wow, you're so impressed with your own argument that you've posted it at least three times now. So, I'll demolish it again: "‘We accidentally recorded over the original videos and photos, and we destroyed all the technology, so that’s why we haven’t been back to the moon’ " Said nobody ever. "The ‘moon rocks’ given to Netherlands by Neil Armstrong himself, were investigated and turned out to be petrified wood" A piece of petrified wood was mislabelled in one Dutch museum. The same museum also had actual lunar samples. "Not only that, they went 6 times, played golf and drove the buggy around" Yes. "and done flips." Really? During which Apollo mission did that happen? "But erm… we don’t know how to go back 80 years later with much improved tech etc." Have you never heard of Artemis? "If you believe that , then you have Stockholm syndrome." That's not what Stockholm syndrome is. So, really, REALLY bad show on your part.

@@paulbeardsley4095 ✔

Your denial has no effect on the historical reality.

If you were truly skeptical, you would also direct skepticism towards your own confirmation-bias, and why you appear to be directly comparing two different missions as comparing apples to apples when they are not. You say that ‘contemporary technology still requires multiple refuelings to reach the moon’. But you don’t support your claim with any evidence or context at all. Also, would you like to explain how Artemis 1 reached the moon and beyond without ‘multiple refuellings’?

@@tubecated_development ​​⁠ ‘We accidentally recorded over the original videos and photos, and we destroyed all the technology, so that’s why we haven’t been back to the moon’ - NASA The ‘moon rocks’ given to Netherlands by Neil Armstrong himself, were investigated and turned out to be petrified wood Not only that, they went 6 times, played golf and drove the buggy around and done flips. But erm… we don’t know how to go back 80 years later with much improved tech etc. If you believe that 🤣, then 3:02 you have Stockholm syndrome. 😂🤣🤣🤣😂😅😂🤣😅😂🤣

@@altingashi3927 Each time you repost this, it means more people are likely to see just how ignorant you are. Let's demolish it again: "‘We accidentally recorded over the original videos and photos, and we destroyed all the technology, so that’s why we haven’t been back to the moon’ " Said nobody ever. "The ‘moon rocks’ given to Netherlands by Neil Armstrong himself, were investigated and turned out to be petrified wood" A piece of petrified wood was mislabelled in one Dutch museum. The same museum also had actual lunar samples. "Not only that, they went 6 times, played golf and drove the buggy around" Yes. "and done flips." Really? During which Apollo mission did that happen? "But erm… we don’t know how to go back 80 years later with much improved tech etc." Have you never heard of Artemis? "If you believe that , then you have Stockholm syndrome." That's not what Stockholm syndrome is. So, really, REALLY bad show on your part.

As tube just pointed out, whatever you think you're remaining, "skeptical" is not the word. Try replacing it with "uninformed". That works better.

Why are you even talking about the VABs, when you don’t know that it’s plural? Why are you citing Van Allen, yet you say that you disagree with him? Yet you haven’t done the tests that Van Allen did for Apollo. So why are you pretending to be a physicist?

@@tubecated_development not sure I understood anything in your reply is that english?

@@jessebennettfilm Which words did you struggle with? Or are you just trying to avoid answering my questions? “The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious & entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense.” - Dr James Van Allen Please show your workings/calculations and how/why you disagree with Dr Van Allen. I’ll wait…

@@tubecated_development FOX? thats where you get your information lol okay professor you win lol

@@jessebennettfilmDo you have serious comprehension-challenges? Read the quote again. Dr Van Allen was criticising/debunking FOX, because they were peddling the same nonsense that you are. He was saying that FOX were entertaining people with _nonsense_ . The exact same nonsense that you are spouting. Do you not understand English? I recommend basic English language classes and also basic science. You are evidently quite illiterate in both language and science. I mean this as no insult. Many adults are comprehension-challenged because they skipped school or for some other reason/s. You can only benefit from rethinking your approach to your own ongoing learning as an adult. At the very least, read that Dr Van Allen quote as many times as it takes for you to comprehend it. Get someone to help you if you have trouble. I’m no ‘professor’, I just comprehend, speak and write English as a native language, and also have basic scientific-literacy. Basic stuff. Remember, you are the one who seems to think that you know more about this subject than the very same physicist who both discovered and measured the Van Allen Belts.

Gibberish

Or Christian’s logic is flawed.

​@@DemonDrummer I used to spend lots of time (Darwin forgive me!) arguing with fundamentalists of various flavors. Once on _Rapture Ready,_ a woman told me that she used to feel guilty about pouring weed killer down the drain, but now that she knows Jesus will come for her soon, she realizes that it doesn't matter. That's where this "the only important thing is getting your ticket to Heaven" belief is not so funny any more.

@@therealzilch Very true…sadly.

You didn’t hear him correctly. Allow me to paraphrase: and all-loving god cannot be all-powerful (or vice versa) due to horrible things that happen to people all the time.

Is that so ? Well I never. 😎😎😎

Proof? Didn’t think so. 😊

Horses' hooves.

Wrong. They jumped higher than they would have jumped in full dress on the earth.

Now lets have a think about this. Do I believe some random nobody dude on the internet giving his opinion that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings didn't happen ? Or do I accept what Modern History tells me about it all. ? I think I'll go with Modern History if you don't mind. Sorry. Well I'm not really. 🤣

Another 8 month old sock puppet account struggling to cope with their inadequacies. Colour me shocked. 😂

@@DemonDrummer Good one DD 🤣

*23 PROOFS THE APOLLO MOON LANDINGS HAPPENED* 1. There is over 18,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There is thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astrologists and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retro reflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, that can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base and the flags. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messaged FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports. 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal. * Comment courtesy of DemonDrummer 1018*

You can't even get the name of the Van Allen Belts right. Go away and don't come back until you've got yourself an education.

@@paulbeardsley4095... So I take it you had no other counter to any else I posted,? Just a spelling mistake that you understood anyway...you're pathetic, go back to playing with your toy Nasa rockets in your mommas basement with your food-stained Nasa t-shirt 🤣😂

You're the liar here, or should we just blame it on your comical ignorance?

@@randyschissler5791 I'd blame it on sad and pathetic ignorance publicly and willfully displayed actually.

What?

@@DemonDrummer he said focus on earth instead of living on another planet. I agree with Elon Musk that we need to have a plan B in case a giant meteor hits the earth like what happened with the dinosaurs or something else like ww3 nuclear apocalypse

@@BC-pe8ds There is some merit to that line of thinking. ☺️

Yeah, because the Apollo samples cover the entire Moon...

Quote, “The country [China] said it would make samples available internationally, after first allowing Chinese researchers and institutions access.” “The Chang’e 5 samples originate from regions of the Moon not yet sampled by NASA and are expected to provide valuable new scientific insight on the geological history of the Moon, which could provide new understanding of the Earth-Moon system and potentially inform NASA’s future lunar exploration plans,”

Think…

ALL FAKE MOON ROCK

beacuse all of them fake no helium-3 like china moon rock

Stop parroting what you've watched on ignorant conspiracy YT fake moon landing siteS THE SUPPOSED LOST APOLLO 11 TAPES NASA searched for but could not locate some of the original Apollo 11 data tapes - “original” in the sense that they directly recorded data transmitted from the Moon. An intensive search of archives and records concluded that the most likely scenario was that the program managers determined there was no longer a need to keep the tapes - since all the video and data were recorded elsewhere - and they were erased and reused. The data on those tapes, including video data, were relayed to the Manned Spacecraft Center (now the Johnson Space Center), during the mission. The video was recorded there and in other locations; there is no missing video footage from the Apollo 11 moonwalk. The search discovered high-quality broadcast versions of the footage. NASA worked with Lowry Digital, a premier film restoration company, to process the video using techniques unavailable in 1969. The restored video was released in HD as part of the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11. NASA did not lose any film or telemetry tapes but rather the taped recordings of raw analogue video transmitted back from the Apollo 11spacecraft. The tapes were made using specially designed, high-capacity recording gear in order to capture the raw transmissions at the point of receipt in case anything should go wrong with the elaborate system used to convert them to a standard broadcast signal. Nothing did go wrong, and once the conversion and transmission was complete, the recordings were no longer needed for their original purpose. Any magnetic recording media has a limited life. The magnetic fields of the stored data decay over time. For this reason, and because high-grade tapes were very expensive, they were never considered an archival medium. It may seem odd today, but in 1969, the second-hand copies filmed off specially built, flat screen CRT displays were considered the archival copies, and we still have a number of these, including some shot by NASA and some shot third or fourth hand by television networks and affiliates. 😎

"Didn't Nasa say they destroyed all docs, schematics and telemetry of the Apollo program?" No. Someone told you this and you appear to have believed them. Why? Here's the important question for you. Why would these so-called conspiracy theorists have lied to you??

@eventcone Didn't Don Pettit state, "I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond, but unfortunately we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back."

@@MajinRaazHe didn’t mean what you think he meant.

@@MajinRaaz No. You left out something. Here is the full quote: "I'd go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and its a painful process to build it back again". Why did you leave out his statement that "we don't have the technology to do that anymore" and that "we used to"? So you are quoting a man who said that we used to have the technology to go to the Moon, but leaving out the part where he says that. Why??

Moronic post.

*Going down the proverbial 'Rabbit Hole' of Conspiratorial Thinking* One of the important characteristics of conspiracy theories such as that the SIX Apollo Moon Missions were faked, is that they are immune to real evidence. All evidence is interpreted to support the conspiracy. Correct evidence is hidden. Contradictory evidence is planted. And faced with evidence that might disprove the conspiracy, believers move the 'goal posts' and make excuses. This is often seen in the tactic of the 'Gish Gallop'. Example. Changing the subject of discussion. *Generally there's a double standard for evidence. Official sources can't be trusted. But a random nobody guy on You Tube, or a podcast knows the truth And often the evidence is simply perceived motivations and the vague notion that something must be wrong* If you care about what really is truth, it's important to protect our beliefs from falsification. If a belief is true, it will withstand scrutiny. So scrutinise them. Importantly, there are real conspiracies, but finding them requires critical thinking and evidence. Not conspiratorial thinking. The bottom line is, Critical Thinking is empowering. But conspiratorial thinking is anything but. So it's best to avoid the proverbial 'Rabbit Hole' of self delusions.

Why are you asking that? Do you think faking it would be easy? Because what we are talking about here is faking it in such a way that the fakery would be undetectable. In 1968 - 1972?? Honestly??

There are far subtler ways of embarrassing yourself… Do better, learn.

@@eventcone must watch material: MIT Science Report “landing man on the moon” (1966). They had everything they needed to make the fakery happen (while trying for real). Of course it’s more likely than not that lunar walking never happened. Chance 1/12000? And yes! Bingo, right on spot 6 times! Only those space missions were this unbelievably successful-on first trial! ⚡️🫵 They made no mistakes! Just literally really minor ones… 😅 their personal reflections on the lunar experience is underwhelming- but they’re good talking machines- all sounding the same. Extremely weird and awkward interactions with the media, uninspiring interviews, nervousness, lack of popularity outside scientific community and many other factors that connect the astronauts make a list of empirical reasons why millions of people around the world question authenticity of NASA.

Your feelings a worth 'dick'

I agree with your wife.

Well your _”feelings”_ are misplaced.

I have a feeling that you shouldn't trust your feelings.

Wow ! He actually did. Did you watch all the video ? Hmmmmm

Yes he did. Are you serious?

This is a 4 year old video. Where did you guys come from?

@@pbodys16 Where did you come from?

Im really not sure.

Is that so ? Well I never.

Proof?

How did they fake the 840 lbs of Moon rocks, examined by hundreds of geologists from all around the world?

Now lets have a think about this. Do I believe some random nobody dude on the internet giving his opinion that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings didn't happen ? Or do I accept what Modern History tells me about it all. ? I think I'll go with Modern History if you don't mind. Sorry. Well I'm not really. 🤣

I’d LOVE to see your evidence.

Let me guess, your “evidence” to substantiate that claim is ignorance, confirmation bias, lies, feelings, and fallacious logic, right? Do better, learn.

I have a very important proof....There was a huge solar wind, just at the time when the moon expedition took place. think that is evidence enough in itself.  

*WTF* ❓

You know what’s an even bigger “huge, unsourced assumption,” any “god” or “gods” exist at all when there is no evidence to substantiate that they do. Do better, learn.

Your argument isn’t with Tyson, it’s with other believers who claim that God *is* in control of everything.

Tat ta 😎

See ya!

Re-read your hilarious diatribe and tell me if you can spot the glaring irony and hypocrisy. 😅 Do better, learn.

Unintentionally hilarious!

No it’s not an actual NASA quote. It is neither what Don Pettit said nor what he meant. Try learning what actually happened and what was really said instead of picking the rotten cherries of conspiracy theorists.

What’s the exact quote. Say it and expand on why you think it is definitive proof that the Moon landings were faked while not committing any logical fallacies. Go. 😊 Do better, learn.

Looks like Paul Beardsley and Demon Drummer have completely OWNED you. 🤣

He explained the Moon? Must’ve been a different video.

Why? Expand.

@DemonDrummer hahah, are you being sarcastic? He literally did not expand at all. All he said was it would be harder to fake. Which seems completely illogical that faking a video is harder than what most would agree was the single greatest accomplishment in human history.

@@realChewky You think a faked video would fool the people who matter?

@@realChewky No, I wanted *_you_* to expand. But sure, let’s go over your obvious confusion. NDT is saying that faking the Moon landing would have gotten NASA 99% of the way to the Moon with humans anyways. Which is why he says in the very start of the video, at that point, “just go to the Moon.” Why don’t you explain how they would have faked objects and humans behaving exactly as expected in a vacuum and one-sixth Earth’s gravity for hours uncut. Go. Do better, learn.